基于改进群组层次分析法的机场II/III类运行效益影响因素研究

doi:10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2023.01.012

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to study the influencing factors of Category II/III operational efficiency of transportation airports, an index system regarding the factors influencing the Category II/III operation efficiency is established refering to the relevant regulations as well as airport surveys, and the group Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is adopted to optimize it by improving the scoring method and k-means clustering algorithm. The comparison of the index weight results obtained using the methods before and after the improvement show that the weight obtained via the improved group AHP is considerably different, which is suitable for extracting key influencing factors. Finally, the key influencing factors, such as site transformation and lighting system upgrading, are analyzed and relevant suggestions are proposed for the benefit of Category II/III operation and construction in China.

Key words: transport airport, Category II/III operation, group analytic hierarchy process, k-means clustering, benefit

CLC Number:

V351

LIU Yang, YANG Deyong, HE Xin, SUN Qiang. Research on factors influencing airport Category II/III operation benefit based on improved group analytic hierarchy process[J].Shandong Science, 2023, 36(1): 90-98.

Figures/Tables 11

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.1

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Fig.2

Table 6

Table 7

Fig.3

Fig.4

References 18

[1]	International Civil Aviation Organization. Manual of all-weather operations: Doc.9365[S]. Europe: The Europe and North Atlantic Office of ICAO, 2017.
[2]	饶建强, 李志成, 田雷. 重庆江北机场实施02L西跑道仪表着陆Ⅱ类运行的项目建设[J]. 重庆建筑, 2018, 17(4): 59-62. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9107.2018.04.59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9107.2018.04.59
[3]	BRAGA L C, DA SILVA T A. ILS CAT III no Brasil: custo-benefício de instalação no Brasil[J]. Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society, Goiânia, 2019, 12(1): 14-23.
[4]	KIM H Y, KWEON P J, PARK J H, et al. A study for estimation of benefit from upgrading precision approach runway category[J]. Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 2019, 27(3): 70-81.
[5]	郭晓东. 关于盲降运行[J]. 中国民用航空, 2014(3): 44.
[6]	陆欣. 仪表着陆系统Ⅲ类升级方案设计[J]. 电子技术与软件工程, 2014(5): 113-114.
[7]	中国民用航空局. 航空器运营人全天候运行规定:AC-91-FS-2012-16[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空总局, 2012.
[8]	中国民用航空局. 民用航空机场运行最低标准制定与实施准则:AC-97-FS-2011-01[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空总局, 2011.
[9]	中国民用航空局. 运输机场仪表着陆系统(ILS)低能见度运行管理规定:AC-91-CA-2019-01[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空总局, 2019.
[10]	许树柏. 实用决策方法层次分析法原理[M]. 天津: 天津大学出版社, 1988.
[11]	SAATY T L. Theanaly tic hierarchy process[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980
[12]	高阳, 罗贤新, 胡颖. 基于判断矩阵的专家聚类赋权研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2009, 31(3): 593-596.
[13]	吴泽宁, 张文鸽, 管新建. AHP中判断矩阵一致性检验和修正的统计方法[J]. 系统工程, 2002, 20(3): 67-71. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4098.2002.03.015. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4098.2002.03.015
[14]	徐泽水. 群组决策中专家赋权方法研究[J]. 应用数学与计算数学学报, 2001, 15(1): 19-22. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6330.2001.01.003. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6330.2001.01.003
[15]	梁樑, 熊立, 王国华. 一种群决策中确定专家判断可信度的改进方法[J]. 系统工程, 2004, 22(6): 91-94. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4098.2004.06.021. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4098.2004.06.021
[16]	JAIN A K. Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2010, 31(8): 651-666. DOI:10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011
[17]	王千, 王成, 冯振元, 等. K-means聚类算法研究综述[J]. 电子设计工程, 2012, 20(7): 21-24. DOI:10.14022/j.cnki.dzsjgc.2012.07.034. doi: 10.14022/j.cnki.dzsjgc.2012.07.034
[18]	马鑫, 段刚龙, 王建仁, 等. 基于改进轮廓系数法的航空公司客户分群研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 140-146. DOI:10.12005/orms.2021.0020. doi: 10.12005/orms.2021.0020

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits third parties to freely share (i.e., copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform, or build upon the material) the articles published in this journal, provided that appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. The material may not be used for commercial purposes. For details of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

打分方式	专家对各指标相对重要性进行打分	专家根据上层关联指标对各指标进行独立重要性打分
打分负荷(次数)	60	12
一致性问题	大概率不通过	一定通过

问卷	C5	C6	C7	C8	C9	C10	C11	C12	C13	C14	C15	C16
1	6	6	1	7	3	3	3	7	3	3	6	6
2	7	9	9	7	7	7	7	7	7	5	5	7
3	5	9	9	9	5	5	3	8	5	2	7	3
4	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9
5	8	5	8	8	8	7	8	8	8	8	8	4
6	6	7	6	6	6	7	7	6	7	7	7	7
7	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	8
8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8
9	8	8	5	5	8	8	8	4	8	8	8	8
10	8	7	7	7	7	8	7	7	7	7	7	8
11	8	8	8	6	6	7	7	8	7	7	7	5
12	1	9	7	2	2	2	2	2	1	1	3	1

指标	C5	C6	C7	C8	C9	C10
权重	0.080 2	0.128 1	0.099 5	0.101 7	0.070 8	0.071 7
指标	C11	C12	C13	C14	C15	C16
权重	0.063 6	0.098 1	0.067 6	0.054 7	0.095 0	0.069 0

指标	B1	B2	B3	B4	B5	B6	B7
初始权重	0.114 4	0.137 6	0.128 0	0.120 3	0.178 5	0.160 2	0.160 8
权重优化	0.065 4	0.078 6	0.073 1	0.068 7	0.076 5	0.068 7	0.068 9
最终权重	0.130 8	0.157 3	0.146 3	0.137 5	0.153 0	0.137 3	0.137 9

Research on factors influencing airport Category II/III operation benefit based on improved group analytic hierarchy process

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 18

Related Articles 4

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

问卷	C5	C6	C7	C8	C9	C10	C11	C12	C13	C14	C15	C16
1	6	6	1	7	3	3	3	7	3	3	6	6
2	7	9	9	7	7	7	7	7	7	5	5	7
3	5	9	9	9	5	5	3	8	5	2	7	3
4	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9
5	8	5	8	8	8	7	8	8	8	8	8	4
6	6	7	6	6	6	7	7	6	7	7	7	7
7	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	8
8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8
9	8	8	5	5	8	8	8	4	8	8	8	8
10	8	7	7	7	7	8	7	7	7	7	7	8
11	8	8	8	6	6	7	7	8	7	7	7	5
12	1	9	7	2	2	2	2	2	1	1	3	1

[1]	SHAN Fei, ZHU Yakun, NIE Shigang, WU Xu. Analysis of factors influencing the traffic economic benefits of rural roads in Henan Province [J]. Shandong Science, 2023, 36(3): 115-122.
[2]	LIU Fang-cong,LI Peng-bo,TIAN Li-jun. Analyzing the influence range of development benefits of rail transit under various connection modes [J]. Shandong Science, 2022, 35(3): 82-88.
[3]	LUO Bing, WEI Li-ying. Particle swarm optimization based multibenefit intersection signal timing model [J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2016, 29(6): 87-93.
[4]	ZHOU Kang,HE Shi-wei,SONG Rui,CHENG Ling-yan. Chinese railway pallet pool system and its benefit analysis [J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2014, 27(5): 67-72.

问卷	C5	C6	C7	C8	C9	C10	C11	C12	C13	C14	C15	C16
1	6	6	1	7	3	3	3	7	3	3	6	6
2	7	9	9	7	7	7	7	7	7	5	5	7
3	5	9	9	9	5	5	3	8	5	2	7	3
4	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9
5	8	5	8	8	8	7	8	8	8	8	8	4
6	6	7	6	6	6	7	7	6	7	7	7	7
7	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	8
8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8
9	8	8	5	5	8	8	8	4	8	8	8	8
10	8	7	7	7	7	8	7	7	7	7	7	8
11	8	8	8	6	6	7	7	8	7	7	7	5
12	1	9	7	2	2	2	2	2	1	1	3	1

问卷	C5	C6	C7	C8	C9	C10	C11	C12	C13	C14	C15	C16
1	6	6	1	7	3	3	3	7	3	3	6	6
2	7	9	9	7	7	7	7	7	7	5	5	7
3	5	9	9	9	5	5	3	8	5	2	7	3
4	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9
5	8	5	8	8	8	7	8	8	8	8	8	4
6	6	7	6	6	6	7	7	6	7	7	7	7
7	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	8
8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	8
9	8	8	5	5	8	8	8	4	8	8	8	8
10	8	7	7	7	7	8	7	7	7	7	7	8
11	8	8	8	6	6	7	7	8	7	7	7	5
12	1	9	7	2	2	2	2	2	1	1	3	1