醋红大戟的质量标准研究

doi:10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2023.04.003

Abstract

Abstract:

The study aimed to conduct a comprehensive study on the quality requirements for Knoxiae Radix processed with vinegar and to offer technical support for the formulation of the standard of Shandong Province Chinese herbal medicine processing specification. On the basis of the quality standard of vinegar-processed Knoxiae Radix in Shandong Province Chinese herbal medicine processing specification (2012), 29 batches of Knoxiae Radix samples were collected. Following vinegar processing, the parameters including characteristics, moisture, total ash, acid insoluble ash, alcohol soluble extract content, microscopic, and thin layer and content determination were systematically studied and analyzed and the relevant limits were formulated. The project was established on the basis of the current quality standard, in which the microscopic identification, and the lucidin content determination were added, and the extractum item were revised when compared with current quality standard. This study established the Knoxiae Radix quality control index after vinegar processing. The established method of quality control is simple, reproducible, and accurate which can be used for quality control of vinegar-processed Knoxiae Radix.

Key words: vinegar-processed Knoxiae Radix, identification, quality standard, lucidin, content determination

CLC Number:

R284.1

CHEN Xi, GAO Yan, WANG Yanghai, JIA Mingqian, ZHANG Yue, MA Lulan, ZHAO Bonian. Study on the quality standard of vinegar-processed Knoxiae Radix[J].Shandong Science, 2023, 36(4): 18-28.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Fig.3

Table 2

Fig.4

Table 3

Results of precision test"

编号	峰面积	平均峰面积	$δ R S D$ /%
1	16 389	16 353	0.29
2	16 395
3	16 397
4	16 284
5	16 336
6	16 316

Table 3

Table 4

Results of stability test"

进样时间/ h	峰面积	平均峰面积	$δ R S D$ /%
0	16 496	16 396	0.45
2	16 457
4	16 407
8	16 385
12	16 296
24	16 337

Table 4

Table 5

Results of repetitive test"

编号	峰面积值	均值	质量分数/(mg·g^-1)	平均质量分数/(mg·g^-1)	$δ R S D$ /%
1-1	16 350	16 364	2.50	2.46	1.01
1-2	16 377	16 364	2.50
2-1	16 264	16 280	2.48
2-2	16 297	16 280	2.48
3-1	16 138	16 149	2.46
3-2	16 160	16 149	2.46
4-1	16 012	16 020	2.44
4-2	16 028	16 020	2.44
5-1	15 836	15 880	2.43
5-2	15 924	15 880	2.43
6-1	16 008	16 040	2.45
6-2	16 072	16 040	2.45

Table 5

Table 6

Results of recovery test of lucidine"

编号	称样量/g	样品中含量/mg	测得量/mg	对照品加入量/mg	回收率/%	平均回收率/%	$δ R S D$ /%
1	0.502 3	0.331 5	0.636 0	0.312 5	97.44	99.16	1.07
2	0.501 6	0.331 0	0.642 4	0.312 5	99.65
3	0.504 2	0.332 7	0.646 6	0.312 5	100.45
4	0.503 3	0.332 1	0.644 2	0.312 5	99.87
5	0.503 5	0.332 3	0.641 3	0.312 5	98.90
6	0.504 8	0.333 1	0.641 5	0.312 5	98.67

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Fig.5

References 18

[1]	刘寒, 缪剑华, 李林轩, 等. 红芽大戟的保育研究[J]. 中国现代中药, 2022, 24(3): 403-406. DOI: 10.13313/j.issn.1673-4890.20210222001. doi: 10.13313/j.issn.1673-4890.20210222001
[2]	李淑行, 张翼飞, 杨雪, 等. 保山红大戟的组织培养及移栽驯化[J]. 保山学院学报, 2019, 38(5): 18-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9340.2019.05.004. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9340.2019.05.004
[3]	吴陈军, 王嘉林, 程金鹏, 等. HPLC法同时测定云南红大戟中三种蒽醌类化合物的含量[J]. 中国药师, 2017, 20(6): 1120-1122. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-049X.2017.06.046. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-049X.2017.06.046
[4]	武天元. 中药毒性药材炮制研究进展[J]. 中国中医药科技, 2022, 29(1): 170-173.
[5]	薛蓉, 宫静雯, 屈凌芸, 等. 毒性中药饮片炮制研究进展与探讨[J]. 世界中医药, 2022, 17(9): 1193-1201. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2022.09.001. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2022.09.001
[6]	卫生部药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典1964年版一部[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1964: 115-116.
[7]	卫生部药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典1977年版一部[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1978: 256-257.
[8]	李兴华. 关于红大戟醋制的探讨[J]. 中医杂志, 2011, 52(6): 534-536. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2011.06.030. doi: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2011.06.030
[9]	国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典2010年版一部[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2010: 140-141.
[10]	山东省药品监督管理局. 山东省中药饮片炮制规范2012年版[M]. 济南: 山东友谊出版社, 2012:286.
[11]	国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典2020年版一部[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020:56-157.
[12]	张乐林. 京大戟炮制原理的初步研究[D]. 济南: 山东中医药大学, 2011.
[13]	吕文海, 张要武. 中药醋制初探[J]. 中成药研究, 1982, 4(4): 19-21.
[14]	包勒朝鲁, 那生桑. 大戟属药用植物的毒性及炮制减毒增效研究进展[J]. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2018, 20(4): 585-591. DOI: 10.11842/wst.2018.04.019. doi: 10.11842/wst.2018.04.019
[15]	石娅娴. 红大戟的化学成分及其微生物发酵改性研究[D]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2020.
[16]	牛天增, 王玉龙, 侯沁文, 等. 党参功效成分含量与土壤因子相关性分析[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2022, 28(11): 164-172. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20220813. doi: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20220813
[17]	黄洁. 不同炮制工艺对何首乌中成分含量的影响[J]. 智慧健康, 2022, 8(7): 121-123. DOI: 10.19335/j.cnki.2096-1219.2022.07.038. doi: 10.19335/j.cnki.2096-1219.2022.07.038
[18]	黄健. 炮制因素对大黄中有效成分蒽醌类化合物的影响[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2018, 5(97): 178-179. DOI: 10.16281/j.cnki.jocml.2018.97.133. doi: 10.16281/j.cnki.jocml.2018.97.133

样品编号	w(水分)/%	w(总灰分)/%	w(酸不溶性灰分)/%	w(浸出物)/%
1	7.06	11.91	2.70	50.94
2	9.08	11.63	1.98	50.57
3	8.20	11.59	1.72	50.75
4	9.28	11.78	2.09	52.74
5	7.19	11.22	1.47	51.51
6	5.98	14.50	2.58	45.80
7	8.60	11.75	1.93	51.97
8	7.89	12.83	2.29	51.25
9	7.52	14.51	2.32	47.63
10	8.24	11.44	2.06	48.52

编号	进样量/μg	峰面积
1	0.25	1 071
2	0.62	3 369
3	1.25	7 309
4	1.88	11 328
5	2.50	15 496
6	3.75	23 459

序号	称样量/g	峰面积	芦西定质量分数/%	平均质量分数/%
1-1	1.009 5	11 531 048	0.184 7	0.184 5
1-2	1.001 4	11 420 657	0.184 4	0.184 5
2-1	1.008 3	3 040 587	0.048 7	0.048 7
2-2	1.007 5	3 033 430	0.048 7	0.048 7
3-1	1.002 4	7 133 074	0.115 0	0.112 4
3-2	1.009 8	6 853 125	0.109 7	0.112 4
4-1	1.012 0	6 030 045	0.096 3	0.093 9
4-2	1.004 4	5 685 088	0.091 5	0.093 9
5-1	1.017 0	7 014 051	0.111 5	0.112 9
5-2	1.014 9	7 172 049	0.114 2	0.112 9
6-1	1.015 9	4 176 313	0.066 5	0.066 6
6-2	1.000 5	4 131 090	0.066 7	0.066 6
7-1	1.009 4	4 289 685	0.068 7	0.068 0
7-2	1.002 1	4 167 083	0.067 2	0.068 0
8-1	1.000 1	3 937 391	0.063 6	0.064 1
8-2	1.000 5	3 999 106	0.064 6	0.064 1
9-1	1.004 2	6 380 008	0.102 7	0.103 6
9-2	1.013 0	6 544 643	0.104 4	0.103 6
10-1	1.003 5	8 044 776	0.129 6	0.bi131 2
10-2	1.015 4	8 347 371	0.132 9	0.bi131 2

序号	称样量/g	峰面积	芦西定质量分数/%	平均质量分数/%
1-1	1.002 9	9 957.756 5	0.160 9	0.159 5
1-2	1.007 5	9 838.266 0	0.158 2	0.159 5
2-1	1.004 3	5 076.464 5	0.081 9	0.080 9
2-2	1.009 9	4 980.033 0	0.079 9	0.080 9
3-1	1.007 6	15 973.488 5	0.256 8	0.255 8
3-2	1.009 8	15 877.234 0	0.254 7	0.255 8
4-1	1.008 6	6 719.530 0	0.107 9	0.108 1
4-2	1.007 0	6 731.740 0	0.108 3	0.108 1
5-1	1.008 2	5 262.974 0	0.084 6	0.085 5
5-2	1.004 9	5 355.437 0	0.086 3	0.085 5
6-1	1.001 9	19 341.067 0	0.312 7	0.314 7
6-2	1.002 9	19 608.138 0	0.316 7	0.314 7
7-1	1.009 3	7 994.255 0	0.128 3	0.128 0
7-2	1.004 7	7 922.574 5	0.127 7	0.128 0
8-1	1.109 6	4 326.914 0	0.063 2	0.063 4
8-2	1.111 9	4 365.194 0	0.063 6	0.063 4
9-1	1.003 6	4 146.123 0	0.066 9	0.067 9
9-2	1.003 2	4 259.750 5	0.068 8	0.067 9
10-1	1.013 8	10 058.182 5	0.160 7	0.161 2
10-2	1.013 7	10 110.278 5	0.161 6	0.161 2

Study on the quality standard of vinegar-processed Knoxiae Radix

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 18

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHUANG Hao, LI Yang, TAO Mingkun. CNN-LSTM driver intention recognition method based on Attention mechanism [J]. Shandong Science, 2023, 36(2): 103-111.
[2]	TAI Shaohua, HU Jindong, WEI Shaowen, HONG Bo, WANG Xixin, SUN Youmin. Screening,identification, and functional evaluation of low temperature degradation of straw Trichoderma [J]. Shandong Science, 2023, 36(2): 50-58.
[3]	ZHANG Cheng-gang, YANG Chang-gui, XIAO Cheng-hong, FAN Di, GONG An-hui, HUANG Yan, ZHOU Tao. Chemical composition of Radix Dipsaci [J]. Shandong Science, 2022, 35(5): 1-9.
[4]	GE Jun-wei, LI Ping, ZHANG Tong-tong, GAO Fei, WANG Wen-yue, WANG Jun-nan, SUN Zhi-ying. Molecular identification of a newly discovered medicinal plant, Isodon rubescens, in Shandong using DNA barcoding [J]. Shandong Science, 2022, 35(4): 15-20.
[5]	ZHANG Hui-min, SONG Jian, XU Lin, DONG Xue, ZHONG Fang-xiao. Improvement of the TLC identification standard of Yinqiao Powder in Chinese Pharmacopoeia [J]. Shandong Science, 2022, 35(4): 9-14.
[6]	SU Yang, XU Ling-chuan. Pharmacognostical and molecular pharmacognostical identification of Periplaneta americana L. [J]. Shandong Science, 2021, 34(3): 19-25.
[7]	FENG Jing, ZHOU Bing-qian, LIU Qian, WANG Xiao, LU Heng, GUO Lan-ping, LIU Wei, SHI Guo-yu. Study on the interaction between phthalic acid and Rhizoctonia solani mycelium growth of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge. [J]. Shandong Science, 2020, 33(5): 34-42.
[8]	SUN Zhi-qiang, WANG Xiao. Quality analysis of Semiaquilegiae Radix of different origins based on haracteristic fingerprint and content determination of two components [J]. Shandong Science, 2020, 33(1): 16-23.
[9]	LI Ji-shun, CHEN Kai, WANG Yi-lian, LI Hong-mei, TANG Yong-hui, WEI Yan-li, HU Jin-dong, ZHAO Zhong-juan, YANG He-tong. Screening and identification of Trichoderma spp. against seedling blight of Panax quinquefolium L. and its control efficiency on the plot [J]. Shandong Science, 2019, 32(5): 62-70.
[10]	WANG Xiao, LI Yuan-yuan, SUN Zhi-qiang, WU Ming-ze, GAO Peng, DAI Long. Aesculetin content determination and characteristic HPLC chromatogram of Violae Herba obtained from different habitats [J]. Shandong Science, 2019, 32(4): 24-31.
[11]	LI Yan, CHENG Hong-jie, LI Ke-ming. Content determination of paeoniflorin in Yiganfuzhengqingdu Granules by HPLC [J]. Shandong Science, 2019, 32(2): 22-27.
[12]	SUN Dan-dan, WANG Gang, HE Huan-xiang, GUO Qing-mei. Study on quality of Isatidis Radix in different production areas [J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2018, 31(5): 20-23.
[13]	YAN Hui-jiao, WANG Zhi-wei,LIN Yun-liang, GAO Hong-mei, LI Feng, WANG Xiao, GENG Yan-ling. Quantitative ¹H NMR based content determination of ginsenoside Rd [J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2018, 31(4): 26-30.
[14]	LIN Yun-liang, GAO Hong-mei, LI Feng, WEI Xiang-yu,WANG Zhi-wei, JIANG Hai-long, WANG Dai-jie. Spectroscopic characteristics and structural identification of cefamandole nafate [J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2018, 31(3): 113-118.
[15]	ZHANG Hui，ZHANG Li-mei，LIU Shan-xin，SU Ming，LI Ying，ZHAO Li-jian. Research on determination of ingredients in Dingbai plaster by HPLC [J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2018, 31(3): 19-22.