胡椒药材商品规格等级标准研究

doi:10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2025083

Abstract

Abstract: To study the commercial specifications and grading standards for Piperis Fructus, 40 samples of Piperis Fructus collected from the herbal markets were analyzed. Based on the literature review and market investigation, the appearance traits of Piperis Fructus were selected. Descriptive statistical analysis and analysis of variance, confidence intervals of the means, practical production conditions, and market operability were employed to determine the grading indicators of Piperis Fructus. In addition, piperine content was used as a quality indicator to analyze differences among different grades and to examine the correlation between appearance traits and piperine content. The literature review and market investigation revealed that Piperis Fructus with larger plump and stronger aroma has traditionally been considered superior, and is classified into two categories: white pepper and black pepper. Data analysis showed that was significantly different in grain number of 50 g, using the grain number of 50 g as a classification index of Piperis Fructus. In accordance with the 2020 edition of the Chinese Pharmacopeia and practical production considerations, two specifications (white pepper and black pepper) and two grades (selected and standard) were defined. Multiple comparisons indicated that the piperine content in selected white pepper was significantly higher than that in selected black pepper. Correlation analysis showed that piperine content in both white and black pepper was significantly negatively correlated with the number of grains per 50 g, but did not significantly correlate with diameter or damage rate. This study establishes commercial specifications and grading standards for Piperis Fructus based on appearance traits, which align with current market conditions and could serve as a reference for standardizing market transactions and circulation.

Key words: Piperis Fructus, commercial specifications and grades, appearance trait indicators, standard

CLC Number:

R282.71

FENG Wangyin, FUYan, XU Qingqing, ZHOU Tao, YANG Changgui, ZHANG Jinqiang, XIAO Chenghong. Study on the commercial specifications and grading standards for Piperis Fructus[J].Shandong Science, 0, (): 1-.

References

[1]国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典:一部[S].北京:中国医药科技出版社.2020:254.

[2] 郑维全, 杨建峰, 鱼欢, 等. 我国胡椒产业现状与创新发展探析[J]. 热带农业科学, 2017, 37(12): 102-108.

[3] 于岚, 郝正一, 胡晓璐, 等. 胡椒的化学成分与药理作用研究进展[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2020, 26(6): 234-242. DOI:10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20192149.

[4] 曾小红, 李光辉, 王小芳, 等. 中国胡椒生产和贸易发展分析[J]. 热带农业科学, 2023, 43(9): 108-113.

[5] 张艳秋, 洪金波. 海南胡椒药材的HPLC指纹图谱研究[J]. 中草药, 2007, 38(7): 1084-1087.

[6] 苏敬. 唐·新修本草——辑复本[M]. 尚志钧, 辑校. 合肥: 安徽科学技术出版社, 1981: 359.

[7] 唐慎微. 重修政和经史证类备用本草[M]. 陆拯, 等, 校注. 北京: 中国中医药出版社, 2013: 945.

[8] 李时珍. 本草纲目-第二册——校点本[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1979: 1858.

[9] 陈嘉谟. 本草蒙筌[M]. 王淑民, 等, 点校. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1988: 98.

[10] 李婷, 李石飞, 雷振宏, 等. 连翘药材商品规格等级标准研究[J]. 山西大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 42(3): 619-627. DOI:10.13451/j.cnki.shanxi.univ(nat.sci.).2018.09.07.004.

[11] 陈晓龙, 陈光静, 柳中, 等. 海南黑、白胡椒有效成分的检测及其分析[J]. 中国调味品, 2017, 42(11): 98-102. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2017.11.022.

[12] 潘晓翠, 成宏斌, 王帆林, 等. 成熟度及处理方式对胡椒活性成分及其含量的影响[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2024, 37(9): 114-118.

[13]Arianne Schnabel. Piperine biosynthesis in black pepper (Piper nigrumL.) [D]. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 2021.

[14] MORM E, MA K, HORN S, et al. Experimental characterization of the drying of kampot red pepper (Piper nigrumL.)[J]. Foods, 2020, 9(11): 1532. DOI:10.3390/foods9111532.

[15] 张悦, 邓爱平, 方文韬, 等. 果实种子类药材商品规格等级标准——以枸杞子枳壳栀子柏子仁等6种药材为例[J]. 中国现代中药, 2019, 21(6): 717-722. DOI:10.13313/j.issn.1673-4890.20190403007.

[16] 沈一琦, 康萍, 杨骏, 等. 基于外观性状和内在成分的栀子质量等级评价[J]. 中成药, 2024, 46(8): 2703-2710.

[17] 刘小康, 贡济宇, 蔡广知, 等. 五味子商品规格等级及其质量评价[J]. 医药导报, 2021, 40(9): 1247-1252. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2021.09.016.

[18] 刘振东, 兰金旭, 陈随清. HPLC结合电子眼技术分析不同采收期的枸橘药材质量[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2021, 46(20): 5253-5259. DOI:10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20210720.102.

[19] 贾银芝, 吴琦, 王鑫, 等. 基于辨状论质法结合熵权法分析辛夷外观性状与内在质量的相关性[J]. 中药新药与临床药理, 2021, 32(8): 1178-1182. DOI:10.19378/j.issn.1003-9783.2021.08.016.

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits third parties to freely share (i.e., copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform, or build upon the material) the articles published in this journal, provided that appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. The material may not be used for commercial purposes. For details of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Study on the commercial specifications and grading standards for Piperis Fructus

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 11

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	WANG Aijun, WANG Cong, SHI Chaoying, ZHAO Hong. A standardized method for evaluating the fluorescence performance of seawater chlorophyll-a sensors [J]. Shandong Science, 2025, 38(3): 84-89.
[2]	YIN Chengyue, LI Jian, YANG Yanfeng, SHAO Yingying, ZHU Ying. Study on local standards for pollution control and resource utilization of bulk industrial solid waste in Shandong Province [J]. Shandong Science, 2025, 38(2): 53-61.
[3]	ZHANG Xiaodan, HE Xiaodong, GAO Yan, YANG Longfei, ZHANG Guanqun, YU Zixiang, LIU Mingjun, WANG Yafei, GENG Zangjia, ZHAO Bonian. A study on the quality standards of Huanglian Hupo Qingxin pills [J]. Shandong Science, 2024, 37(4): 17-25.
[4]	CHEN Xi, GAO Yan, WANG Yanghai, JIA Mingqian, ZHANG Yue, MA Lulan, ZHAO Bonian. Study on the quality standard of vinegar-processed Knoxiae Radix [J]. Shandong Science, 2023, 36(4): 18-28.
[5]	WU Weikui, YAN Qianru, GU Bingming, LIU Jia, SONG Wei. Quality risk evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine preparations based on the value of the feeding standard [J]. Shandong Science, 2023, 36(4): 29-34.
[6]	LI Hui-juan, LIU Lan-qi, ZHAO Mei, SONG Shan-jun, CHEN Xiang-feng. Synthesis of chlorinated paraffins with different chlorination degrees [J]. Shandong Science, 2021, 34(5): 97-103.
[7]	XU Rui-dong, TIAN Ming-wei. Advances in research on disposable medical protective clothing [J]. Shandong Science, 2020, 33(3): 18-27.
[8]	LI Ming, TIAN Ming-wei. Technical standards and prospects of medical masks [J]. Shandong Science, 2020, 33(3): 28-34.
[9]	WU Ming-ze, LIU Guo-fei, Wang Xiao, Li Ting, Wang Chang-lin, Gao Peng, Dai Long. Mass transfer of Radix Gentianae Macrophyllae medicinal herb and standard decoction of medicinal slices [J]. Shandong Science, 2019, 32(4): 16-23.
[10]	WANG you-feng, CAO yun-fei, BAI xiao-ying. Study on the quality standard of Xiaochuan Emplastrum [J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2017, 30(3): 39-44.
[11]	DING Cheng-Cheng, LIU Jian. Standardization of sewage outlets for automatic monitoring of sewage pollution sources [J]. J4, 2011, 24(4): 64-68.