车载及船载场景PPP-B2b动态定位性能分析

doi:10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.20240075

Abstract

Abstract:

The assessment of PPP-B2b kinematic positioning performance under different scenarios will be an important reference for users and contribute to the expansion of the application scope and promotion of BDS-3. In this study, the kinematic positioning performance of the PPP-B2b service of BDS-3 under different scenarios was comprehensively analyzed by performing one vehicle experiment and one vessel experiment. Experimental results indicate that using the post-processing product released by the Helmholtz Centre Potsdam-German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) as a reference, the PPP-B2b product had orbit correction accuracy up to the decimeter level and clock correction accuracy up to the sub-meter level. In the vehicle experiment of PPP-B2b, multipath-root mean square (MP-RMS) for BDS-3 B1/B2 frequencies was 41.3 cm, while that for GPS L1/L2 frequencies was 52.2 cm. The positioning accuracies of BDS-3 in the horizontal and vertical directions were 10.3 and 10.5 cm and those of the BDS-3+GPS combination were 5.6 and 4.9 cm, respectively. In the vessel experiment of PPP-B2b, the MP-RMS for BDS-3 B1/B2 frequencies was 52.5 cm, while that for GPS L1/L2 frequencies was 70.4 cm. The accuracy values of BDS-3 in the horizontal and vertical directions were 22.5 and 12.0 cm and those of the BDS-3+GPS combination were 9.7 and 5.1 cm, respectively. The overall impact of multipath effects on the kinematic positioning performance of PPP-B2b in the vessel environment was slightly greater than that in the vehicle environment.

Key words: precise point positioning, BeiDou-3 navigation satellite system, PPP-B2b service

CLC Number:

P228

XIE Xiaofeng, ZHANG Yuanfan, WANG Zhenjie, DU Jun. Assessment of PPP-B2b kinematic positioning performance under vehicle and vessel scenarios[J].Shandong Science, 2025, 38(3): 118-131.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

References 23

[1]	张小红, 胡家欢, 任晓东. PPP/PPP-RTK新进展与北斗/GNSS PPP定位性能比较[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(9): 1084-1100.DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20200328.
[2]	HADAS T, BOSY J. IGS RTS precise orbits and clocks verification and quality degradation over time[J]. GPS Solutions, 2015, 19(1): 93-105. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-014-0369-5.
[3]	LI B F, ZHANG Z T, ZANG N, et al. High-precision GNSS ocean positioning with BeiDou short-message communication[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2019, 93(2): 125-139. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-018-1145-z.
[4]	姬生月, 孙嘉文, 宋云记, 等. 基于北斗短报文的远海实时精密单点定位[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2021, 43(6): 74-84. DOI:10.11887/j.cn.202106010.
[5]	YANG Y X, LIU L, LI J L, et al. Featured services and performance of BDS-3[J]. Science Bulletin, 2021, 66(20): 2135-2143. DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2021.06.013.
[6]	YANG Y X, GAO W G, GUO S R, et al. Introduction to BeiDou-3 navigation satellite system[J]. Navigation, 2019, 66(1): 7-18. DOI: 10.1002/navi.291.
[7]	宋伟伟, 赵新科, 楼益栋, 等. 北斗三号PPP-B2b服务性能评估[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2023, 48(3): 408-415. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200686.
[8]	TANG C P, HU X G, CHEN J P, et al. Orbit determination, clock estimation and performance evaluation of BDS-3 PPP-B2b service[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2022, 96(9): 60. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-022-01642-9.
[9]	NIE Z X, XU X F, WANG Z J, et al. Initial assessment of BDS PPP-B2b service: Precision of orbit and clock corrections, and PPP performance[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(11): 2050. DOI: 10.3390/rs13112050.
[10]	XU Y Y, YANG Y X, LI J L. Performance evaluation of BDS-3 PPP-B2b precise point positioning service[J]. GPS Solutions, 2021, 25(4): 142. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-021-01175-2.
[11]	黄伦文, 孟宪伟. 基于北斗3号PPP-B2b信号的精密单点定位精度分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2021, 41(5): 516-519. DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2021.05.014.
[12]	TAO J, LIU J N, HU Z G, et al. Initial assessment of the BDS-3 PPP-B2b RTS compared with the CNES RTS[J]. GPS Solutions, 2021, 25(4): 131. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-021-01168-1.
[13]	郭斐, 周超, 吴子恒. 北斗三号PPP-B2b信号精度及精密单点定位性能评估[J]. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 14(06):658-666.DOI: 10.13878/j.cnki.jnuist.2022.06.003.
[14]	肖浩威, 王江林, 郭海荣, 等. PPP-B2b服务的实时精密单点定位精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022(4): 117-121.DOI: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0121.
[15]	朱恩慧, 郭海荣, 李金龙, 等. 基于BDS-3 PPP-B2b服务的实时PPP性能分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2022, 42(6): 616-621. DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2022.06.012.
[16]	XU X F, NIE Z X, WANG Z J, et al. An improved BDS-3 PPP-B2b positioning approach by estimating signal in space range errors[J]. GPS Solutions, 2023, 27(3): 110. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-023-01455-z.
[17]	中国卫星导航系统管理办公室. 北斗卫星导航系统空间信号接口控制文件精密单点定位服务信号(1.0版)[EB/OL]. ( 2020-07-01) [2024-03-25]. http://www.beidou.gov.cn/xt/gfxz/202008/P020200803362060731204.pdf.
[18]	刘路, 郭金运, 周茂盛, 等. GNSS广播星历轨道和钟差精度分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2022, 47(7): 1122-1132. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20200166.
[19]	李征航, 黄劲松. GPS测量与数据处理[M]. 3版. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2016.
[20]	NIE Z X, WANG B Y, WANG Z J, et al. An offshore real-time precise point positioning technique based on a single set of BeiDou short-message communication devices[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2020, 94(9): 78. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-020-01411-6.
[21]	GENG J H, CHEN X Y, PAN Y X, et al. PRIDE PPP-AR: An open-source software for GPS PPP ambiguity resolution[J]. GPS Solutions, 2019, 23(4): 91. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-019-0888-1.
[22]	WANNINGER L, BEER S. BeiDou satellite-induced code pseudorange variations: Diagnosis and therapy[J]. GPS Solutions, 2015, 19(4): 639-648. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-014-0423-3.
[23]	STEIGENBERGER P, DENG Z G, GUO J, et al. BeiDou-3 orbit and clock quality of the IGS Multi-GNSS Pilot Project[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2023, 71(1): 355-368. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.08.058.

Assessment of PPP-B2b kinematic positioning performance under vehicle and vessel scenarios

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 23

Related Articles 1

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0