城市轨道交通换乘站点失效下网络脆弱性分析

doi:10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2022.01.011

Abstract

Abstract:

Urban rail transit transfer station failure can lead to network degradation and make the urban rail transit system performance vulnerable. Network vulnerability analysis under transfer station failure is of significance to guarantee operational safety. Considering the coupling relation between urban rail transit networks and external public transport networks, generalized passenger travel cost under transfer station failure is analyzed and passenger travel choice behavior is modelled. From the perspective of the operation service network degradation, the measurement indicator of network vulnerability is developed to quantify the influence of the failure. The urban rail transit topology structure network is modelled, and a vulnerability analysis framework of urban rail transit network is established. A case study on Shenzhen urban rail transit network is conducted; the results show that the vulnerability performance and passenger flow differ for different transfer station failures. Network vulnerability analysis can help managers identify the key transfer stations and devise pertinent emergency strategies.

Key words: urban rail transit, transfer station failure, network vulnerability, passenger travel choice, generalized travel cost

CLC Number:

U293.1

NING Li-qiao,XIE Bing-lei,ZHANG Xi,XU Wen-kai. Network vulnerability analysis under urban rail transit transfer station failure[J].Shandong Science, 2022, 35(1): 81-87.

Figures/Tables 5

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 1

References 18

[1]	许葭, 宋守信, 袁朋伟, 等. 基于ANP的地铁站点网络脆弱性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(12):129-134. DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2015.12.022. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2015.12.022
[2]	裴彦. 暴雨灾害条件下轨道交通网络脆弱性与抗毁性研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2019.
[3]	王磊, 陈运涛. 基于脆弱性理论城市轨道交通的乘客安全研究[J]. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 41(2):198-203.
[4]	邓旭东, 王雪, 徐文平, 等. 城市地铁网络脆弱性对比分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(3):152-156. DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.03.027. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.03.027
[5]	郭露露, 苏国锋, 路堃, 等. 基于复杂网络理论的北京地铁网络脆弱性评估[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2017, 43(11):30-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-425X.2017.11.008. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-425X.2017.11.008
[6]	张建华. 地铁复杂网络的连通脆弱性研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2012.
[7]	蔡鉴明, 邓薇. 长沙地铁网络复杂特性与级联失效鲁棒性分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2019, 16(6):1587-1596. DOI: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.2019.06.031. doi: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.2019.06.031
[8]	SUNL S, HUANG Y C, CHEN Y Y, et al. Vulnerability assessment of urban rail transit based on multi-static weighted method in Beijing, China[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018, 108:12-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.12.008. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.12.008
[9]	WANG J J, LI Y S, LIU J Y, et al. Vulnerability analysis and passenger source prediction in urban rail transit networks[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(11):e80178. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080178
[10]	SUN D, GUAN S T. Measuring vulnerability of urban metro network from line operation perspective[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016, 94:348-359. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.024. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.024
[11]	沈吟东, 宫剑. 基于区域划分的地铁网络脆弱性评价方法[J]. 系统工程学报, 2018, 33(3):289-297. DOI: 10.13383/j.cnki.jse.2018.03.001. doi: 10.13383/j.cnki.jse.2018.03.001
[12]	YE Q, KIM H. Assessing network vulnerability of heavy rail systems with the impact of partial node failures[J]. Transportation, 2019, 46(5):1591-1614. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-018-9859-6. doi: 10.1007/s11116-018-9859-6
[13]	冯树民, 麻海洲, 吕天玲, 等. 考虑攻击程度的城市轨道交通网络抗毁性分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2019, 43(3):379-384. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.2095-3844.2019.03.001. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.2095-3844.2019.03.001
[14]	刘飞. 暴雨极端天气下城市公共交通双层复杂网络脆弱性研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2019.
[15]	张琳, 陆建, 雷达. 基于复杂网络和空间信息嵌入的常规公交-地铁复合网络脆弱性分析[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 49(4):773-780. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2019.04.022. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2019.04.022
[16]	曲迎春, 徐仲之, 龚航, 等. 城市轨道交通网络脆弱性分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2016, 13(11):2276-2283. DOI: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.2016.11.025. doi: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.2016.11.025
[17]	吴焕, 彭湖, 陈梓星, 等. 基于SP调查的出行时间价值估计及出行者属性影响分析[J]. 交通与运输, 2019, 35(6):9-12.
[18]	何流, 段仲渊, 丘建栋. 基于SP调查的出行时间价值估计方法研究[J]. 金陵科技学院学报, 2016, 32(2):30-33. DOI: 10.16515/j.cnki.32-1722/n.2016.02.008. doi: 10.16515/j.cnki.32-1722/n.2016.02.008

失效换乘站点	绕行乘客比/%	平均绕行延误费用/元	损失乘客比/%	平均客流损失费用/元
老街站	4.76	1.84	1.99	11.82
大剧院站	0.81	0.90	3.13	11.89
会展中心站	3.59	1.28	2.89	12.76
购物公园站	0.09	0.93	1.96	11.35
车公庙站	4.94	1.21	5.62	11.85
世界之窗站	1.65	2.35	1.45	9.16
前海湾站	6.40	3.99	0.34	14.64
宝安中心站	5.61	1.76	0.89	13.58
赤湾站	0.19	3.02	0.13	17.90
后海站	1.97	1.70	2.58	17.85
安托山站	1.10	1.35	0.32	8.94
景田站	1.15	1.31	1.77	10.90
福田站	9.04	1.06	2.68	11.04
市民中心站	0.98	0.98	1.10	12.12
华强北站	0.20	1.38	1.65	10.53
黄贝岭站	3.29	2.00	2.09	12.49
石厦站	1.01	0.76	1.50	12.51
少年宫站	3.96	0.76	0.99	11.93
华新站	1.14	1.06	1.20	11.28
红岭站	0.56	1.43	0.82	10.71
田贝站	0.89	1.39	1.25	11.59
布吉站	2.63	4.54	3.09	11.65
福民站	0.34	1.49	1.50	10.74
上梅林站	1.85	1.95	2.41	14.22
深圳北站	4.03	4.73	3.79	15.41
西丽站	1.49	4.86	2.77	13.46
太安站	1.01	1.53	1.02	13.68
红岭北站	1.22	1.67	1.18	10.53
红树湾南站	0.55	1.37	0.11	21.76

Network vulnerability analysis under urban rail transit transfer station failure

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 18

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	JIANG Jiawei, ZHAO Jinbao, LIU Wenjing, XU Yuejuan, LI Mingxing. Short-term prediction of urban railtransit passenger flow based on the Sparrow Search Algorithm-Long Short Term Memory combination model [J]. Shandong Science, 2023, 36(5): 75-84.
[2]	ZHANG Yiguo, QU Yunchao, YIN Haodong, WU Jianjun. Route optimization for emergency evacuation vehicles in case of rail station closure [J]. Shandong Science, 2023, 36(4): 80-88.
[3]	PENG Lei, FAN Cong, WANG Qian, WANG Xiao-chao, BAI Yun. Design and implementation of optimized system for vertical alignment of metro track [J]. Shandong Science, 2022, 35(4): 136-143.
[4]	WANG Bo, BAO Feng, WU Xin-ran. Optimization of random assignment model of urban rail transit passenger flow based on fully observable and controllable experimental method [J]. Shandong Science, 2022, 35(4): 90-97.
[5]	LIU Xue-li,XIU Chun,YANG Li-chen. Influence of urban rail network scale based on subjective and objective multidimensional variables [J]. Shandong Science, 2022, 35(1): 107-114.
[6]	ZHU Shi-guang, SI Bing-feng, CUI Hong-meng, XUE Jing-wen. Travel destination prediction method for urban rail transit passengers using spatiotemporal feature extraction [J]. Shandong Science, 2021, 34(4): 104-113.
[7]	PENG Lei, SUN Yuan-guang, JIN Hua. Design of subway parking lines with two train spaces [J]. Shandong Science, 2021, 34(3): 54-61.
[8]	CAO Lu, CAO Cheng-xuan. Train operation plan and train timetable optimization of urban rail transport based on passenger demand [J]. Shandong Science, 2020, 33(6): 87-95.
[9]	ZHANG Shu-tian, LI Hu, LI Zuo-zhou, NIU Ling, YANG Xin, WU Jian-jun. Simulations and delay-evaluations for urban rail transit under an emergency event [J]. Shandong Science, 2020, 33(4): 72-82.
[10]	LIN Yu-tong, CAO Cheng-xuan, LIU Yu-tong, FENG Zi-yan. Collaborative optimization of train timetabling and rolling stock based on passenger demand [J]. Shandong Science, 2020, 33(2): 63-70.
[11]	WANG Xing-rong, WANG Shi-sheng. Robust optimization of the coordinated passenger inflow control in a metro line under uncertain passenger demand [J]. Shandong Science, 2019, 32(6): 69-78.
[12]	SONG Zhou-min, LIU Ge-hui, ZHANG Chen-xi. Analysis of operating capacity and organization of access operation at depot junction station [J]. Shandong Science, 2019, 32(6): 79-88.
[13]	CHEN Ming-dian，ZHENG Xuan-chuan，GAO Guo-fei. Application of pedestrian simulation in passenger transportation evaluation of transfer stations in urban rail transit [J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2018, 31(4): 100-109.
[14]	GU Hai-ting. Integrated planning method of routing and formation for urban rail transit [J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2017, 30(2): 85-94.
[15]	XU Fan, HAN Baoming, LI Dewei, ZHOU Weiteng. Simulation based evacuation time of deeply buried metro stations [J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2015, 28(6): 101-110.