策略性等待下Y型瓶颈的单步拥堵收费模型

doi:10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2017.02.011

山东科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 67-77.doi: 10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2017.02.011

策略性等待下Y型瓶颈的单步拥堵收费模型

张梦婷¹，丁建勋^1,2，郑杨边牧¹，龙建成¹

1. 合肥工业大学汽车与交通工程学院，安徽合肥 230009；2. 合肥工业大学过程优化与智能决策教育部重点实验室，安徽合肥 230009

收稿日期:2016-12-27 出版日期:2017-04-20 发布日期:2017-04-20
作者简介:张梦婷（1992—），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为交通拥堵收费。E-mail：18855170302@163.com
基金资助:
中国博士后科学基金(2014T70588，2013M530295)；国家自然科学基金(71201041，71371026， 71431003)

The single-step congestion toll model of Y-shaped bottleneck under tactical waiting

ZHANG Meng-ting¹, DING Jian-xun^1,2, ZHENG-YANG Bian-mu¹, LONG Jian-cheng¹

1.School of Automative and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent DecisionMaking Ministry of Education, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China

Received:2016-12-27 Online:2017-04-20 Published:2017-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文针对包含至少一个上游瓶颈路段和一个共用的下游瓶颈路段的Y型交通路网，研究了策略性等待单步收费条件下早高峰期间通勤者的出行行为和最优道路拥挤收费方案。基于出行者的出发时间选择遵循用户均衡准则的假设，推导出了不同汇合规则下用户均衡的流入率和个人出行成本。依据出行者的出发时间选择规律，进一步推导出了最优的道路拥挤收费时段和费率。研究发现，策略性等待单步收费可以有效降低交通网络的系统总阻抗，但可能会增加出行者的个人出行成本。此外，还发现收费的有效性不但与汇合规则有关，还取决于上下游瓶颈路段通行能力的相对大小。该研究验证了Y型交通路网上存在Braess诡异现象，即扩大上游路段的瓶颈通行能力可能会引起系统总出行成本的增加。

关键词: Y型瓶颈, 策略性等待, 出发时间选择, 单步收费模型, 道路拥挤收费

Abstract:

In this paper, according to the Y-shaped traffic network containing at least one upstream bottleneck and a common downstream bottleneck, the departure time choice behavior and the optimal road congestion pricing scheme during morning peak hours were investigated under tactical waiting and single step toll. Based on the assumption that the departure time choice followed the user equilibrium (UE) principle, the equilibrium departure rate and individual trip cost under different merging rules were derived. According to the departure time choice behavior, the optimal road congestion charging period and toll level were further derived. Research showed that the proposed pricing scheme could effectively decrease the total congestion of the traffic network system, however, it might lead to the increase in individual trip cost. In addition, it also found that the effectiveness of the proposed pricing scheme not only depended on the merging rules, but also depended on the relative magnitudes of the capacities of the upstream and downstream bottlenecks. Finally, the results showed that there was Braess paradox in the Yshaped traffic network, which meant that the total system travel cost could be increased when the capacity of the upstream bottleneck was increased.

Key words: Y-shaped bottleneck, single-step toll model, tactical waiting, departure time choice, road congestion pricing

中图分类号:

U491

张梦婷，丁建勋，郑杨边牧，龙建成 . 策略性等待下Y型瓶颈的单步拥堵收费模型[J]. 山东科学, 2017, 30(2): 67-77.

ZHANG Meng-ting, DING Jian-xun, ZHENG-YANG Bian-mu, LONG Jian-cheng. The single-step congestion toll model of Y-shaped bottleneck under tactical waiting[J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2017, 30(2): 67-77.

参考文献

［1］VICKREY W S. Congestion theory and transport investment［J］. The American Economic Review,1969，59（2）:251260.
［2］ARNOTT R, de PALMA A, LINDSEY R. Departure time and route choice for the morning commute［J］. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1990, 24(3):209228.
［3］LAIH C H. Queueing at a bottleneck with singleand multistep tolls［J］. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1994, 28(3):197208.
［4］LAIH C H. Effects of the optimal step toll scheme on equilibrium commuter behaviour［J］. Applied Economics, 2004, 36(1):5981.
［5］LINDSEY C R, van den BERG V A C, VERHOEF E T. Step tolling with bottleneck queuing congestion［J］. Journal of Urban Economics, 2012, 72(1):4659.
［6］ARNOTT R, de PALMA A, LINDSEY R. A structural model of peak period congestion: A traffic bottleneck with elastic demand［J］. American Economic Review, 1993, 83(1):161179.
［7］RAMADURAI G, UKKUSURI S, ZHAO J,et al. Linear complementarity formulation for single bottleneck model with heterogeneous commuters［J］. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2010, 44(2):193214.
［8］LI H, BOVY P H, BLIEMER M C. Departure time distribution in the stochastic bottleneck model［J］. International Journal of Its Research, 2008, 6(2):7986.
［9］LINDSEY R. Cost recovery from congestion tolls with random capacity and demand ［J］. Journal of Urban Economics, 2009, 66(1):1624.
［10］KUWAHARA M. Equilibrium queuing patterns at a twotandem bottleneck during the morning peak［J］. Transportation Science, 1990, 24(3):217229.

［11］ARNOTT R, de PALMA A, LINDSEY R. Properties of dynamic traffic equilibrium involving bottlenecks, including a paradox and metering［J］. Transportation Science, 1993, 27(2):148160.
［12］YANG H, HUANG H J. Analysis of the timevarying pricing of a bottleneck with elastic demand using optimal control theory ［J］. Transportation Research B: Methodological, 1997, 31（6）:425440.
［13］朱广芹, 佟光霁, 代磊磊. 城市道路交通拥挤收费的博弈分析［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2009, 29(7): 147152.
［14］吴子啸, 黄海军. 瓶颈道路使用收费的理论及模型［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2000, 20(1):130135.
［15］XIAO F, SHEN W, ZHANG H M. The morning commute under flat toll and tactical waiting［J］. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2012, 46(10):13461359.
［16］XIAO L L, LIU R, HUANG H J. Stochastic bottleneck capacity, merging traffic and morning commute［J］. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2014, 64:4870.
［17］SMALL K A. The scheduling of consumer activities: Work trips［J］. American Economic Review, 1982, 72(3): 467479.

[1]	王恒昆, 谷金, 宋之凡, 王江锋. 基于iTransformer的高速公路通行费精准预测模型[J]. 山东科学, 2025, 38(1): 120-128.
[2]	宋百玲, 李星禹, 刘伟, 邓俊熙, 牟俊麒. 基于注意力机制与动态蛇形卷积的车道线分割算法[J]. 山东科学, 2025, 38(1): 129-140.
[3]	马学祥, 韩梦薇, 周光鑫, 李树彬, 申佳佳, 孔祥科. 基于双层网络模型的城市公共交通系统抗毁性研究[J]. 山东科学, 2024, 37(5): 79-88.
[4]	昝雨尧, 王翔, 王可馨, 沈佳燕. 考虑驾驶人交通环境感知的车辆安全势场及跟驰行为建模[J]. 山东科学, 2024, 37(3): 111-120.
[5]	孟勃, 孔祥科, 李树彬. 基于复杂网络的交通序列数据特性[J]. 山东科学, 2024, 37(1): 107-117.
[6]	王瑜琼. 基于混合需求的高铁快巴动态线路规划方法研究[J]. 山东科学, 2024, 37(1): 118-127.
[7]	王静妍, 张勇. 有桩自行车共享系统吞吐率的近似模型及算法[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(6): 74-85.
[8]	王艳, 陈群. 城市封闭小区开放决策优化模型[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(6): 96-104.
[9]	程思洁, 邵晓明, 李镇, 王江锋. 基于双层规划模型的高速公路差异化收费定价研究[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(5): 93-101.
[10]	张仪果, 屈云超, 尹浩东, 吴建军. 轨道交通封站条件下应急疏散车辆路径优化[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(4): 80-88.
[11]	孙雪心, 凌翔. 双层耦合网络交通驱动病毒传播过程研究[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(4): 89-96.
[12]	刘春生, 曹蓉, 王晓晗, 赵鹤然, 贾健民. 基于门架数据的高速公路运行状态评价研究[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(3): 100-107.
[13]	单飞, 祝亚坤, 聂世刚, 吴旭. 河南省农村公路交通经济效益影响因素分析[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(3): 115-122.
[14]	卢昱臻, 李新刚. 基于乘客异质性的早高峰单起点多讫点公交均衡研究[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(2): 85-92.
[15]	李传耀, 陈依婷. 自主式交通系统功能架构优化密度峰值聚类算法[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(2): 93-102.

策略性等待下Y型瓶颈的单步拥堵收费模型

The single-step congestion toll model of Y-shaped bottleneck under tactical waiting

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0