同时考虑结伴行为和逆行行为的自行车流元胞自动机模型

doi:10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2022.02.010

山东科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 79-88.doi: 10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2022.02.010

同时考虑结伴行为和逆行行为的自行车流元胞自动机模型

芮迎旭(),唐铁桥()

北京航空航天大学交通科学与工程学院,北京 100191

收稿日期:2021-11-16 出版日期:2022-04-20 发布日期:2022-04-07
通信作者: 唐铁桥 E-mail:yingxurui@buaa.edu.cn;tieqiaotang@buaa.edu.cn
作者简介:芮迎旭(1991—),男,博士研究生,研究方向为交通运输规划与管理。E-mail: yingxurui@buaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(71771005)

Extended cellular automata model for bicycle flow considering group and retrograde behaviors

RUI Ying-xu(),TANG Tie-qiao()

School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Received:2021-11-16 Online:2022-04-20 Published:2022-04-07
Contact: Tie-qiao TANG E-mail:yingxurui@buaa.edu.cn;tieqiaotang@buaa.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

结伴行为和逆行行为是两种常见的骑行方式,容易引起自行车流的局部自组织现象和通行效率下降。为研究结伴行为(包括左右结伴和前后结伴)和逆行行为共存对自行车流运动机理和交通特性的影响,建立同时考虑结伴和逆行行为的自行车流元胞自动机模型。通过仿真实验,分别分析左右结伴和前后结伴与逆行共存对自行车流的影响。研究表明:左右结伴和逆行共存会显著降低自行车流的通行能力、增加旅行时间和降低平均速度;前后结伴和逆行共存仅在高车流密度条件下减少平均速度,且引起自行车流轻微振荡;上述负面影响同结伴尺寸、结伴比例、逆行比例和自行车平均到达率等因素有关。这些研究结果有助于更好地管理自行车流,特别是逆行行为管理。

关键词: 交通工程, 自行车, 元胞自动机模型, 结伴行为, 逆行行为

Abstract:

Group and retrograde behaviors are two common bicycle riding that generally induce some local self-organization phenomena and reduce traffic efficiency. Herein, an extended cellular aulomata model that considers group and retrograde behaviors is proposed to explore the impacts of the two behaviors on the movement mechanism and traffic characteristics of bicycle flow. Simulation experiments are performed to investigate the impacts of shoulder/following group behavior and retrograde behavior on bicycle flow. Simulation results show that a mixture of shoulder group behavior and retrograde behavior will reduce the traffic capacity, increase the travel time, and decrease the average riding speed. Alternatively, a mixture of following group behavior and retrograde behavior decrease only the average speed and cause a slight oscillation in bicycle flow. These aforementioned negative impacts are related to various factors: group size, group proportion, retrograde proportion, and average bicycle arrival rate. The findings of this study can facilitate improved bicycle flow management (particularly in the case of retrograde behavior).

Key words: traffic engineering, bicycle, cellular automata model, group behavior, retrograde behavior

中图分类号:

U491

芮迎旭,唐铁桥. 同时考虑结伴行为和逆行行为的自行车流元胞自动机模型[J]. 山东科学, 2022, 35(2): 79-88.

RUI Ying-xu,TANG Tie-qiao. Extended cellular automata model for bicycle flow considering group and retrograde behaviors[J]. Shandong Science, 2022, 35(2): 79-88.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 18

[1]	严巧兵. 基于社会力模型的非机动车混合流仿真研究[D]. 北京: 北京建筑大学, 2020.
[2]	郑斌斌. 逆行影响下的非机动车交通流特性研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2017.
[3]	TANG T Q, LUO X F, ZHANG J, et al. Modeling electric bicycle's lane-changing and retrograde behaviors[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 490: 1377-1386. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.107. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.107
[4]	RUI Y X, TANG T Q, ZHANG J. An improved social force model for bicycle flow in groups[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, 2021: 1-14. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2412655. doi: 10.1155/2021/2412655
[5]	REN G, JIANG H, CHEN J X, et al. Heterogeneous cellular automata model for straight-through bicycle traffic at signalized intersection[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2016, 451: 70-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.12.159. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.12.159
[6]	DONG P, WANG X F, YUN L F, et al. Research on the characteristics of mixed traffic flow based on an improved bicycle model[J]. Journal of Simulation, 2018, 94(5): 451-462. DOI: 10.1177/0037549717736947. doi: 10.1177/0037549717736947
[7]	XU L, LIU M Q, SONG X, et al. Analytical model of passing events for one-way heterogeneous bicycle traffic flows[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018, 2672(36): 125-135. DOI: 10.1177/0361198118788425. doi: 10.1177/0361198118788425
[8]	LI Y X, NI Y, SUN J. A modified social force model for high-density through bicycle flow at mixed-traffic intersections[J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2021, 108: 102265. DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102265. doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102265
[9]	GOULD G, KARNER A. Modeling bicycle facility operation: cellular automaton approach[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009, 2140(1): 157-164. DOI: 10.3141/2140-17. doi: 10.3141/2140-17
[10]	JIANG R, JIA B, WU Q S. Stochastic multi-value cellular automata models for bicycle flow[J]. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 2004, 37(6): 2063-2072. DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/37/6/007. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/37/6/007
[11]	ZHAO Y X, ZHANG H M. A unified follow-the-leader model for vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian traffic[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2017, 105: 315-327. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.09.004. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.09.004
[12]	GUO N, JIANG R, WONG S, et al. Bicycle flow dynamics on wide roads: Experiments and simulation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 125: 103012. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103012. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103012
[13]	TANG T Q, RUI Y X, ZHANG J, et al. A cellular automation model accounting for bicycle's group behavior[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 492: 1782-1797. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.097. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.097
[14]	邝先验, 曹韦华, 吴赟. 考虑混入逆行车辆的非机动车流元胞自动机模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(2): 268-274. DOI: 10.16182/j.cnki.joss.2016.02.002. doi: 10.16182/j.cnki.joss.2016.02.002
[15]	李岩, 胡文斌, 张兴雨, 等. 逆行非机动车骑行者的安全生理学特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(9): 14-19. DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.09.003. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.09.003
[16]	XUE S Q, CLAUDIO F, SHI X M, et al. Revealing the hidden rules of bidirectional pedestrian flow based on an improved floor field cellular automata model[J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2020, 100: 102044. DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2019.102044. doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2019.102044
[17]	NAGEL K, SCHRECKENBERG M. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic[J]. Journal De Physique I, 1992, 2(12): 2221-2229. DOI: 10.1051/jp1: 1992277. doi: 10.1051/jp1: 1992277
[18]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 城市道路工程设计规范:CJJ 37—2012[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.

同时考虑结伴行为和逆行行为的自行车流元胞自动机模型

Extended cellular automata model for bicycle flow considering group and retrograde behaviors

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 18

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王静妍, 张勇. 有桩自行车共享系统吞吐率的近似模型及算法[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(6): 74-85.
[2]	侯明业, 王晓阳, 徐青杰, 杨博, 王笑风. 基于强化学习的沥青路面长期性能养护决策方法[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(3): 108-114.
[3]	姚红云, 曹志富, 凃强. 基于部分优势比的高速公路路产损失严重度分析[J]. 山东科学, 2022, 35(5): 80-88.
[4]	王健, 徐志红, 童蔚苹, 宋雨嘉, 刘志远. 钩形弯交叉口信号协同控制优化方法研究[J]. 山东科学, 2020, 33(3): 109-118.
[5]	教欣萍, 王江锋, 陈磊, 高志军, 董佳宽, 黄海涛, 叶劲松. 基于HALRTC理论的短时交通流预测算法[J]. 山东科学, 2019, 32(6): 62-68.
[6]	王威, 吴中. 信号灯作用下的城市隧道路段交通流模型研究[J]. 山东科学, 2019, 32(3): 57-64.
[7]	李兴东, 袁振洲, 张羽, 郭宏伟. 基于元胞自动机的绿色驾驶行为特征仿真[J]. 山东科学, 2019, 32(2): 70-78.
[8]	兰慧慧，吴先宇，尹永昊. 基于路段流量平衡的转向交通量推算方法研究[J]. 山东科学, 2018, 31(3): 76-84.
[9]	陈文鑫，岳昊,韩红艳,施翔匀. 宁波市公共自行车服务满意度评价模型构建研究[J]. 山东科学, 2018, 31(2): 72-78.
[10]	陈伦，谷远利，陆文琦. 基于模糊综合评价的城市快速路交通状态判别研究[J]. 山东科学, 2017, 30(5): 62-69.
[11]	庄广新，谷远利，马韵楠，赵莹. 基于AHP灰色理论的道路交通流数据质量评价[J]. 山东科学, 2017, 30(1): 69-75.
[12]	刘艳婷，杨小宝，潘丽，四兵锋. 信号交叉口行人与自行车的等待忍耐行为分析[J]. 山东科学, 2016, 29(1): 62-68.
[13]	夏萍萍，魏丽英，马壮林. 基于负二项回归模型的高速公路交通事故影响因素分析[J]. J4, 2013, 26(4): 79-84.