教室内桌椅结构对疏散效率的影响研究

doi:10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2015.06.014

山东科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 87-92.doi: 10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2015.06.014

教室内桌椅结构对疏散效率的影响研究

陈亮，唐铁桥，邵益晓

北京航空航天大学交通科学与工程学院，北京 100191

收稿日期:2015-10-30 出版日期:2015-12-20 发布日期:2015-12-20
作者简介:陈亮（1991-），男，硕士，研究方向为行人疏散建模与仿真分析。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（71422001）

Impact of chair and desk structures in a classroom on evacuation efficiency

CHEN Liang,TANG Tieqiao,SHAO Yixiao

School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191,China

Received:2015-10-30 Online:2015-12-20 Published:2015-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用我们已建立的元胞自动机疏散模型，研究了双出口教室内桌椅结构对疏散效率的影响，并分析了疏散效率的差异问题。研究结果表明，带有写字板的培训椅增加了一些学生到达出口的疏散距离，导致疏散效率降低，并且所有学生同时进行疏散的疏散时间可能不会是最短。该研究有助于教室和类似场景内桌椅的结构设计。

关键词: 行人流, 元胞自动机, 疏散

Abstract: With our constructed cellular automata evacuation model, we address the impact of chair and desk structures in a twoexit classroom on evacuation efficiency.We also analyze the distinction of evacuation efficiencies. Simulation results indicate that training chairs with tablets increase the evacuation distance to an exit for some students. This causes the reduction of evacuation efficiency, and the time interval that all students be simultaneously evacuated may not be shortest. These results are favorable for structure design of chairs and desks in a classroom and other similar scenarios.

Key words: cellular automata, pedestrian flow, evacuation

中图分类号:

U491

陈亮，唐铁桥，邵益晓. 教室内桌椅结构对疏散效率的影响研究[J]. 山东科学, 2015, 28(6): 87-92.

CHEN Liang,TANG Tieqiao,SHAO Yixiao. Impact of chair and desk structures in a classroom on evacuation efficiency[J]. SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2015, 28(6): 87-92.

参考文献

［1］HELBING D, MOLNR P. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics ［J］. Physical Review E, 1998, 51（5）:4282-4286. ［2］HELBING D, FARKAS I, VICSEK T. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic ［J］. Nature, 2000, 407（6803）: 487-490. ［3］HELBING D, ISOBE M, NAGATANI T, et al. Lattice gas simulation of experimentally studied evacuation dynamics ［J］. Physical Review E, 2003, 67(6): 067101. ［4］HOOGENDOORN S P, BOVY P H L. Simulation of pedestrian flows by optimal control and differential games ［J］. Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 2003, 24(3): 153-172. ［5］HOOGENDOORN S P, BOVY P H L. Pedestrian routechoice and activity scheduling theory and models ［J］. Transportation Research Part B, 2004, 38(2): 169-190. ［6］FUKAMACHI M, NAGATANI T. Sidle effect on pedestrian counter flow ［J］. Physica A, 2007, 377(1): 269-278. ［7］VARAS A, CORNEJO M D , MAINEMER D, et al. Cellular automaton model for evacuation process with obstacles ［J］. Physica A, 2007,382(2): 631-642. ［8］ZHANG J, SONG W G, XU X. Experiment and multigrid modeling of evacuation from a classroom ［J］. Physica A, 2008, 387(23): 5901-5909 ［9］ZHAO H, GAO Z Y. Reserve capacity and exit choosing in pedestrian evacuation dynamics ［J］. Journal of Physics A, 2010, 43(10): 105001 ［10］GUO R Y, HUANG H J. Route choice in pedestrian evacuation:Formulated using a potential field ［J］. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2011(04): 04018 ［11］陈亮, 郭仁拥, 塔娜. 双出口房间内疏散行人流的仿真和实验研究［J］. 物理学报, 2013, 62(5): 050506. ［12］LIU S B, YANG L Z, FANG T Y, et al. Evacuation from a classroom considering the occupant density around exits ［J］.Physica A, 2009, 388(9): 1921-1928. ［13］GUO R Y, HUANG H J, WONG S C. Route choice in pedestrian evacuation under conditions of good and zero visibility: Experimental and simulation results ［J］. Transportation Research Part B, 2012, 46(6): 669-686. ［14］SHEN Y, WANG Q S, YAN W G, et al. Evacuation processes of different genders in different visibility conditionsAn experimental study ［J］. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 71: 65-74. ［15］LI M F, ZHAO Y X, HE L R, et al. The parameter calibration and optimization of social force model for the reallife 2013 Ya’an earthquake evacuation in China ［J］. Safety Science, 2015, 79: 243-253. ［16］TANG T Q, CHEN L, GUO R Y, et al. An evacuation model accounting for elementary students' individual properties ［J］. Physica A, 2015, 440: 49-56 ［17］BURSTEDDE C, KLAUCK K, SCHADSCHNEIDER A, et al. Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a twodimensional cellular automaton［J］.Physica A, 2001, 295(3): 507-525.

[1]	张仪果, 屈云超, 尹浩东, 吴建军. 轨道交通封站条件下应急疏散车辆路径优化[J]. 山东科学, 2023, 36(4): 80-88.
[2]	谭宜玮, 刘叔灼, 陈俊生. 盾构综合管廊人员疏散可靠度计算[J]. 山东科学, 2022, 35(4): 144-154.
[3]	芮迎旭,唐铁桥. 同时考虑结伴行为和逆行行为的自行车流元胞自动机模型[J]. 山东科学, 2022, 35(2): 79-88.
[4]	孙悦朋, 郭仁拥, 于涛. 基于密度聚类的多向行人流群集区域分布比较[J]. 山东科学, 2021, 34(5): 64-74.
[5]	王威, 吴中. 信号灯作用下的城市隧道路段交通流模型研究[J]. 山东科学, 2019, 32(3): 57-64.
[6]	李兴东, 袁振洲, 张羽, 郭宏伟. 基于元胞自动机的绿色驾驶行为特征仿真[J]. 山东科学, 2019, 32(2): 70-78.
[7]	程建辉, 李得伟. 基于元胞自动机的无信号人行横道处人车干扰机理研究[J]. 山东科学, 2019, 32(1): 83-92.
[8]	许帆，韩宝明，李得伟，周玮腾. 基于仿真的深埋地铁车站疏散时间研究[J]. 山东科学, 2015, 28(6): 101-110.

教室内桌椅结构对疏散效率的影响研究

Impact of chair and desk structures in a classroom on evacuation efficiency

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0