室内新风空气净化系统微生物多样性研究

doi:10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2020.05.012

山东科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 99-105.doi: 10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2020.05.012

室内新风空气净化系统微生物多样性研究

殷欣¹，孟艺伟¹，赵丽娅¹，齐君¹，夏雪奎¹，高翠玲^2*

1. 齐鲁工业大学（山东省科学院）山东省科学院生物研究所，山东济南 250103; 2. 山东省产品质量检验研究院，山东济南 250102

收稿日期:2020-02-02 出版日期:2020-10-08 发布日期:2020-09-27
作者简介:殷欣（1986—），女，助理研究员，研究方向为微生物多样性。E-mail：1070021457@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2017YFF0209900，2017YFF0209902）

Study of microbial diversity in indoor fresh-air purification system

YIN Xin¹, MENG Yi-wei¹, ZHAO Li-ya¹, QI Jun¹, XIA Xue-kui¹, GAO Cui-ling^2*

1.Biology Institute, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250103, China; 2. Shandong Institute for Product Quality Inspection, Jinan 250102, China

Received:2020-02-02 Online:2020-10-08 Published:2020-09-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对济南市历城区使用不同时间的新风空气净化系统滤膜样本的细菌多样性进行检测，分析室内新风系统潜在的微生物二次污染风险。采集使用6至12个月的新风系统中超细玻璃纤维空气滤膜积累的微生物为样本，进行16S rDNA扩增子测序分析。结果显示：变形菌门、厚壁菌门、放线菌门和拟杆菌门为优势菌门，优势属有副球菌属、鞘氨醇单胞菌属、芽孢杆菌属、甲基杆菌属、双歧杆菌属等；随着滤膜使用时间的增加，优势菌门之间的相对丰度比例变化不明显，但总丰度呈现上升趋势，表明该地区室内空气微生物丰富且群落结构长期变化不大；使用12个月的样本中特别富含莱茵海默氏菌属、乳杆菌属和不动杆菌属，且条件致病菌奥斯陆莫拉氏菌的相对丰度较高，表明该地区的室内新风系统使用12个月时存在微生物二次污染风险。研究结果对居民防控室内空气二次污染起指导作用。

关键词: 室内空气, 新风空气净化系统, 微生物二次污染, 细菌多样性, 16S rDNA扩增子测序

Abstract: We tested the bacterial diversity of filter membrane samples in freshair purification systems in Licheng，Jinan，at different times, and analyzed the potential risk of secondary microbial contamination in indoor fresh-air purification systems.The bacterial diversity of three air-filtration membrane samples obtained from the fresh-air purification system used in Licheng at different times was analyzed using the 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing technology.The dominant bacterial phyla were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The dominant genera in three samples were Paracoccus, Sphingomonas, Bacillus, Methylobacterium,and Bifidobacterium. With the extension of the usage time of the fresh-air purification system, the relative abundance ratio among the dominant fungi did not change significantly, but the total abundance showed an increasing trend, indicating that the microorganism in indoor air was abundant in this area and the community structure did not change much in the long term. For the air-filtration membrane used in the area for 12 months, Rheinheimer, Lactobacillus, and Acinetobacter were also the dominant genera. Moreover, the relative abundance of opportunistic pathogen Moraxella osloensis was high, which indicatesthe indoor fresh-air purification system has a certain risk of microbial secondary pollution when it is used for 12 months. The results of this study can guide residents to prevent and control indoor-air secondary pollution.

Key words: indoor air, fresh-air purification system, secondary microbial contamination, bacterial diversity, 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing technology

中图分类号:

X172

殷欣, 孟艺伟, 赵丽娅, 齐君, 夏雪奎, 高翠玲. 室内新风空气净化系统微生物多样性研究[J]. 山东科学, 2020, 33(5): 99-105.

YIN Xin, MENG Yi-wei, ZHAO Li-ya, QI Jun, XIA Xue-kui, GAO Cui-ling. Study of microbial diversity in indoor fresh-air purification system[J]. Shandong Science, 2020, 33(5): 99-105.

参考文献 21

1	DASSONVILLE C, DEMATTEI C, DETAINT B, et al. Assessment and predictors determination of indoor airborne fungal concentrations in Paris newborn babies’ homes[J]. Environmental Research, 2008, 108(1): 80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.04.006
2	ZHANG Q L, QIU M Z, LAI K F, et al. Cough and environmental air pollution in China[J]. Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2015, 35: 132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2015.10.003
3	李艳菊, 祁建城, 张宗兴, 等. 室内空气微生物污染来源、传播和去除方法研究进展[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2011, 28(1): 86-88. doi: 10.16241/j.cnki.1001-5914.2011.01.030
4	ORJI F A, UGBOGU O C, UGBOGU E A, et al. Pathogenic flora composition and overview of the trends used for bacterial pathogenicity identifications[J]. Microbial Pathogenesis, 2018, 121: 139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.05.006
5	CAPORASO J G, LAUBER C L, WALTERS W A, et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108: 4516-4522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000080107
6	许颖, 马德胜, 宋文枫, 等. 采用16S rDNA高通量测序技术分析油藏微生物多样性[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2016, 22(3): 409-414. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1145.2015.09003
7	VALERIANI F, CIANFANELLI C, GIANFRANCESCHI G, et al. Monitoring biodiversity in libraries: a pilot study and perspectives for indoor air quality[J]. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 2017, 58(3): 238. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2017.58.3.730
8	ZHAO Y, LOW Z X, FENG S, et al. Multifunctional hybrid porous filters with hierarchical structures for simultaneous removal of indoor VOCs, dusts and microorganisms[J]. Nanoscale, 2017, 9(17): 5433-5444. doi: 10.1039/C6NR09779K
9	郝长富, 李刚, 孙熙, 等. 不同饲料饲育的家蚕幼虫肠道细菌的多样性分析[J]. 昆虫学报, 2019, 62(1): 61-72. doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2019.01.007
10	EDGAR R C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads[J]. Nature Methods, 2013, 10(10): 996-998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604
11	吴可人.高浓度CO2与内生菌互作对超积累东南景天生长、镉吸收积累及微生物群落结构的影响[D].杭州:浙江大学,2018.
12	ALHAMLAN F S, AL-QAHTANI A A, AL-AHDAL M N. Recommended advanced techniques for waterborne pathogen detection in developing countries[J]. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 2015, 9(2): 128-135. doi: 10.3855/jidc.6101
13	HEIMERSSON S, HARDER R, PETERS G M, et al. Including pathogen risk in life cycle assessment of wastewater management. 2. quantitative comparison of pathogen risk to other impacts on human health[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(16): 9446-9453. doi: 10.1021/es501481m
14	BECERRA-CASTRO C, MACEDO G, SILVA A M T, et al. Proteobacteria become predominant during regrowth after water disinfection[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2016, 573: 313-323. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.054
15	FORBES S, KNIGHT C G, COWLEY N L, et al. Variable effects of exposure to formulated microbicides on antibiotic susceptibility in firmicutes and proteobacteria[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2016, 82(12): 3591-3598. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00701-16
16	ZHAO Y H, LUKIW W J. Bacteroidetes neurotoxins and inflammatory neurodegeneration[J]. Molecular Neurobiology, 2018, 55(12): 9100-9107. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1015-y
17	ARFKEN A M, SONG B, MALLIN M A. Assessing hog lagoon waste contamination in the Cape Fear Watershed using Bacteroidetes 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015, 99(17): 7283-7293. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6784-x
18	唐小兰. 空气微生物污染的危害与防护技术发展[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2015, 32(12): 1238-1240.
19	刘佳蕊. 鲍曼不动杆菌的研究进展[J]. 转化医学杂志, 2018, 7(6): 382-384.
20	WU S, JIANG Y J, LOU B, et al. Microbial community structure and distribution in the air of a powdered infant formula factory based on cultivation and high-throughput sequence methods[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(8): 6915-6926. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13968
21	周庭银, 赵津彩, 赵虎. 两株奥斯陆莫拉氏菌的分离和鉴定[J]. 上海医学检验杂志, 1991, 6(1): 32.

[1]	李红梅, 魏艳丽, 扈进冬, 杨凯, 刘宝军, 杨合同, BAZHANAU Dzmitry, 李纪顺. 阿特拉津高效降解菌株DnL1-1发酵培养基的优化[J]. 山东科学, 2019, 32(1): 52-56.
[2]	黄玉杰，张闻，傅晓文，高永超，孔学，郭书海，王加宁. 不同NaCl含量、培养基和微量元素对分枝杆菌SP-3降解菲的影响研究[J]. 山东科学, 2016, 29(6): 98-103.
[3]	李红梅, 李成云, 李纪顺, 魏艳丽, 杨合同, BAZHANAU Dzmitry. 阿特拉津降解细菌的直接检测及分离[J]. 山东科学, 2015, 28(6): 17-22.
[4]	王丙莲，冯东，梁晓辉，李大海. 镰刀菌（Fusarium sp.）ZW-21的鉴定及其利用玉米秸秆水解液发酵产乙醇研究[J]. 山东科学, 2015, 28(6): 65-72.
[5]	魏艳丽，李纪顺，扈进冬，张广志，李红梅，杨合同. 降解阿维菌素耐高温菌株AZ11的分离及降解特性[J]. J4, 2013, 26(4): 16-19.
[6]	张广志，李纪顺，杨合同，魏艳丽，扈进冬，任艳，刘伟. 阿维菌素发酵废弃物无害化处理的研究[J]. J4, 2012, 25(5): 104-108.
[7]	李红梅, 张广志, 张新建, 黄玉杰, 李纪顺, 杨合同. 降解毒死蜱多功能菌株的构建及其对土壤的修复作用[J]. J4, 2011, 24(5): 14-17.
[8]	黄玉杰, 张新建, 任艳, 李纪顺, 张广志, 杨合同. 多菌灵降解菌的分离、鉴定及其降解特性研究[J]. J4, 2011, 24(2): 28-34.
[9]	张瑞清, 袁堂玉, 孙燕霞, 刘克宁. 两组纤维素分解菌复合系MC-A1和MC-N1的筛选及其协同功能初探[J]. J4, 2011, 24(2): 35-40.

室内新风空气净化系统微生物多样性研究

Study of microbial diversity in indoor fresh-air purification system

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 9

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0