生态环境损害鉴定中的生态效应评价问题探讨

doi:10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.20240151

山东科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 117-125.doi: 10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.20240151

• 环境损害鉴定方法及技术 • 上一篇下一篇

生态环境损害鉴定中的生态效应评价问题探讨

冷雨凝^1a(), 孙婷^1a^,^1b^,^*(), 王丽莎², 赵苗苗^1a^,^1b, 屈政君^1a, 黄理辉^1a^,^1b, 高振会^1a

1.山东大学 a.生态环境损害鉴定研究院; b.环境科学与工程学院,山东青岛 266237
2.潍坊市污染物排放总量控制中心,山东潍坊 261000

收稿日期:2024-12-13 出版日期:2025-04-20 发布日期:2025-04-16
通信作者: *孙婷,博士后,研究方向为生态修复。E-mail:tsun64@uwo.ca
作者简介:冷雨凝(2000—),博士研究生,研究方向为生态环境损害鉴定。E-mail:lyning0815@gmail.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2022YFB2601903)

Discussion on ecological effect evaluation in the identification of ecological and environmental damage

LENG Yuning^1a(), SUN Ting^1a^,^1b^,^*(), WANG Lisha², ZHAO Miaomiao^1a^,^1b, QU Zhengjun^1a, HUANG Lihui^1a^,^1b, GAO Zhenhui^1a

1. a. Instituteof Eco-Environmental Forensics; b. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
2. Weifang Total Pollutant Discharge Control Centre, Weifang 261000, China

Received:2024-12-13 Online:2025-04-20 Published:2025-04-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态效应评价是生态环境损害鉴定评估中的关键问题,也是生态损害赔偿和修复的重要依据。通过文献调研,系统分析了生态环境损害鉴定中的生态效应评价指标与方法、损害鉴定路径。通过案例探讨,证实了所构建模型在科学评估污染物对生态系统服务价值方面的有效性,还为其他地区开展类似研究提供了方法借鉴和实践启示,具有重要的理论和应用价值。针对当前存在的问题,提出了在生态评价方法优化、技术体系完善、跨部门协同机制构建以及专业人才队伍建设等方面的改进建议。该论文提出的原则和对策,旨在提升生态评估的科学性与精准性,推动生态环境损害鉴定评估标准体系的完善,并为未来相关领域的研究提供参考。

关键词: 生态环境损害鉴定, 生态效应评价, 生态评价指标及方法, 损害量化

Abstract:

Ecological effect evaluation is a critical component in ecological and environmental damage assessment, providing an essential foundation for ecological damage compensation and restoration efforts. We systematically analyze ecological effect evaluation indictors, assessment methodologies, and damage identification pathways through a comprehensive literature review. Case studies validate the effectiveness of the established model in scientifically assessing the impact of pollutants on ecosystem service value, offering both methodological references and practical insights for similar research in other regions, with significant theoretical and applied implications. To address existing challenges, we propose improvements in optimizing ecological evaluation methodologies, refining technical frameworks, establishing cross-sectoral coordination mechanisms, and developing professional expertise. The principles and strategies proposed in this paper aim to enhance the scientific rigor and accuracy of ecological assessments, advance the standardization of ecological and environmental damage assessment systems, and provide valuable references for future research in related fields.

Key words: ecological and environmental damage assessment, ecological effect evaluation, ecological assessment indicators and methods, damage quantification

中图分类号:

X197

冷雨凝, 孙婷, 王丽莎, 赵苗苗, 屈政君, 黄理辉, 高振会. 生态环境损害鉴定中的生态效应评价问题探讨[J]. 山东科学, 2025, 38(2): 117-125.

LENG Yuning, SUN Ting, WANG Lisha, ZHAO Miaomiao, QU Zhengjun, HUANG Lihui, GAO Zhenhui. Discussion on ecological effect evaluation in the identification of ecological and environmental damage[J]. Shandong Science, 2025, 38(2): 117-125.

图/表 2

参考文献 26

[1]	中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《生态环境损害赔偿制度改革试点方案》[EB/OL].[2024-12-03]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2015-12/03/content_5019585.htm.
[2]	吕忠梅. “生态环境损害赔偿”的法律辨析[J]. 法学论坛, 2017, 32(3): 5-13.
[3]	中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《生态环境损害赔偿制度改革方案》[EB/OL].[2024-12-03]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-12/17/content_5247952.htm.
[4]	陈海嵩. 国家治理体系中生态环境损害赔偿的公法解释[J]. 法商研究, 2024, 41(5): 3-17.
[5]	CORTNER H. A case analysis of policy implementation: The national environmental policy act of 1969[J]. Natural Resources Journal, 1999, 16: 323.
[6]	STRONG S, Aviall Services V. Cooper industries: Implications for the United States' liability under CERCLA, the "Superfund Law"[J]. HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL, 2004, 56(1): 193-216.
[7]	SÖZEN S, AVCIOGLU E, OZABALI A, et al. European union water policy:tasks for implementing “Water Framework Directive” in pre-accession countries[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A, Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 2003, 38(8): 1401-1410. DOI:10.1081/ese-120021463.
[8]	MAGALHÃES M F, RAMALHO C E, COLLARES-PEREIRA M J. Assessing biotic integrity in a Mediterranean watershed: Development and evaluation of a fish-based index[J]. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 2008, 15(4): 273-289. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2400.2008.00612.x.
[9]	LEWIS T, BHAGANAGAR K. Configurable simulation strategies for testing pollutant plume source localization algorithms using autonomous multisensor mobile robots[J]. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2022, 19(2): 17298806221081325. DOI:10.1177/17298806221081325.
[10]	FERRARO P J, HANAUER M M. Quantifying causal mechanisms to determine how protected areas affect poverty through changes in ecosystem services and infrastructure[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(11): 4332-4337. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1307712111. pmid: 24567397
[11]	HE J, DUPRAS J, PODER T G. The value of wetlands in Quebec: A comparison between contingent valuation and choice experiment[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2017, 6(1): 51-78. DOI:10.1080/21606544.2016.1199976.
[12]	HANSEN K, MALMAEUS M. Ecosystem services in Swedish forests[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2016, 31(6): 626-640. DOI:10.1080/02827581.2016.1164888.
[13]	CHANG D P. A case study in innovative outreach:combining training, research, and technology transfer to address real-world problems[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1998, 106(Suppl 4): 1065-1067. DOI:10.1289/ehp.98106s41065.
[14]	COSTA M, DESMARAIS B A, HIRD J. Public comments’ influence on science use in U.S. rulemaking: The case of EPA’s national emission standards[J]. The American Review of Public Administration, 2018, 49: 36-50. DOI:10.1177/0275074018795287.
[15]	蒋亚娟, 肖歌予. 环境损害司法鉴定制度研究[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2021(3): 10-20. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2021.03.002.
[16]	戈奕文, 郭超, 吕俊岗. 生态环境损害司法鉴定技术研究进展[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024(1): 48-52. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2024.01.007.
[17]	谷晓坤. 湖北省不同类型土地整治生态效应评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(8): 2263-2269. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2012.0310.
[18]	CHOI H A, SELIGER B, HAN D. Rapid ecosystem services assessment of Mundok Ramsar wetland in Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and opportunities to improve well-being[J]. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 2023, 47: 3. DOI:10.5141/jee.23.010.
[19]	白杨, 郑华, 庄长伟, 等. 白洋淀流域生态系统服务评估及其调控[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 711-717. DOI:10.5846/stxb201203270417.
[20]	吕宪国, 王起超, 刘吉平. 湿地生态环境影响评价初步探讨[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(1): 83-85.
[21]	YANG Q J, LIU H Y. Marine ecological damage assessment model for offshore oil extraction[J]. Global NEST Journal, 2024: 26-8. DOI:10.30955/gnj.06076.
[22]	曾建军, 邹明亮, 郭建军, 等. 生态风险评价研究进展综述[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2017, 29(1): 1-5. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2009.2017.01.001.
[23]	吕一河, 刘国华, 冯晓明. 土壤水蚀的环境效应: 影响因素、研究热点与评价指标的评述[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2011, 27(1): 93-99. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4831.2011.01.019.
[24]	於方, 周昊, 许申来. 生态恢复的环境效应评价研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(01): 374-379. DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2009.01.001.
[25]	刘岩, 贾岳清, 刘荻. 中国生态环境损害鉴定评估现状及建议[J]. 世界环境, 2021(6): 73-75.
[26]	於方, 张志宏, 孙倩, 等. 生态环境损害鉴定评估技术方法体系的构建[J]. 环境保护, 2020, 48(24): 16-21. DOI:10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2020.24.003.

生态环境损害鉴定中的生态效应评价问题探讨

Discussion on ecological effect evaluation in the identification of ecological and environmental damage

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 26

相关文章 1

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0