SHANDONG SCIENCE ›› 2018, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 64-73.doi: 10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2018.05.011
• Tranfic and Transportation • Previous Articles Next Articles
FENG Ying-mei，LI Xin-tai*
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
The urban comprehensive transportation accessibility is closely related to the layout of the star hotel. In this paper, the comprehensive transportation accessibility index of 17 cities in Shandong province was quantized from the urban connectivity and the urban outer accessibility, and the level index system of the star hotel was built and quantified from its scale, structure and development. On this basis, the spatial combination relationship and spatial pattern of the two were analyzed.In this paper,the following conclusions are drawn:（1）The comprehensive transportation accessibility of 17 cities in Shandong province is between 2.8 and 6.7, the coefficient of variation is 0.260, the level index of the star hotel is between 0.092 and 0.850, the coefficient of variation is 0.708, there is a big difference between them。（2）There is a significant nonlinear correlation between the comprehensive transportation accessibility and the level of the star hotel in Shandong province, thus the comprehensive transportation accessibility can improve the level of the star hotel。（3）The combination types between the comprehensive transportation accessibility and the star hotel are divided into 9 categories according to three kinds of relationships. There are 8 cities with the same level of comprehensive transportation accessibility and star hotel, 6 cities with the priority of comprehensive transportation accessibility over the level of the star hotel, and 3 cities with the lag of comprehensive transportation accessibility behind the level of the star hotel. In view of the above conclusions, this paper puts forward some reasonable suggestions.
Key words: the comprehensive transportation accessibility, spatial pattern, Shandong province, the level of the star hotel
CLC Number:
FENG Ying-mei，LI Xin-tai. Study on measuring of the comprehensive transportation accessibility and the level of star hotels and spatial pattern of Shandong province[J].SHANDONG SCIENCE, 2018, 31(5): 64-73.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: http://www.sdkx.net/EN/10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2018.05.011
http://www.sdkx.net/EN/Y2018/V31/I5/64
［1］ASHWORTH G J.Accommodion and the historic city［J］.Built Environment,1989,15(2):92100. [2]EGAN D J，NIELD K. Towards a theory of intraurban hotel location [J] . Urban Studies，2000，37（3）：611621. [3]刘辰，谭石柳，姜海宁.江苏省星级酒店空间布局研究[J].浙江师范大学学报（自然科学版），2014，37（3）：352360. [4]花立明.中国星级酒店空间分布特征与影响因素研究[J].绥化学院学报，2017，37（2）：2125. [5]孙建伟，田野，崔家兴，等.湖北省旅游空间结构识别与可达性测度[J].经济地理，2017，37（4）：208217. [6]马潇，罗寿枚.广州星级酒店的空间分布特征及其形成机理分析[J].珠江经济，2006，3（4）：9096. [7]陈岗，黄震方.基于交通集成度分析的城市饭店空间布局研究——以风景旅游城市桂林主城区为例[J].旅游学刊，2009，24（4）：6166. [8]邵大伟，张小林，马琳，等.风景旅游城市传统旅游服务业空间布局分异研究——以泰安市主城区旅行社和星级酒店为例[J].旅游科学，2010，24（4）：4048. [9]金凤君，王成金，李秀伟.中国区域交通优势的甄别方法及应用分析[J].地理学报，2008，63（8）：787798. [10]刘传明，曾菊新.县域综合交通可达性测度及其与经济发展水平的关系——对湖北省79个县域的定量分析[J].地理研究，2011，30（12）：22092221. [11]黄晓燕，曹小曙，李涛.海南省区域交通优势度与经济发展关系[J].地理研究，2011，30（6）：985999. [12]程钰，刘雷，任建兰，等.县域综合交通可达性与经济发展水平测度及空间格局研究——对山东省91个县域的定量分析[J].地理科学，2013，33（9）：10581065. [13]王成新，王格芳，刘瑞超，等.区域交通优势度评价模型的建立与实证——以山东省为例[J].人文地理，2010，25（1）：7376. [14]金玉婷，张琳娴. 浙江海洋文化景观评价方法研究[J].现代物业，2011，10（3）：8084. [15]渠爱雪. 江苏省新型工业化水平综合测度研究[J].经济地理，2006，26（1）：5559，65. [16]张广海，冯英梅. 山东半岛蓝色经济区旅游产业结构水平综合评价与测度[J].中国人口资源与环境，2013，23（9）：107113. [17]谭跃进. 定量分析方法[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社，2002. [18]中国统计年鉴库.山东统计年鉴2016[EB/OL].［20171020］ http://www.nianjianku.com/dqu/shandong/3257.html. [19]姜海宁，谷人旭，李广斌，等 .南京市星级酒店空间可达性格局研究[J].地域研究与开发，2012，31（2）:129140 [20]刘晓霞，王兴中. 中国旅游饭店供给特征研究[J].经济地理，2002，22（4）:509512 [21]李旭. 我国高星级饭店时空分布特征及动力机制研究[D].开封：河南大学，2012. [22]宁越敏. 上海市区商业中心区位的探讨[J].地理学报，1984，39（2）:163172.
Cited
